The Jermaine L. Green STEM Institute of Queens

The Jermaine L. Green STEM Institute of Queens rated 79/100 in Queens, District 28. ELA proficiency: 50%. Math proficiency: 64%. 509 students enrolled in grades PK-5. View ratings, test scores, parent reviews, and commute times.

Key statistics

Other schools in District 28

Explore guides related to The Jermaine L. Green STEM Institute of Queens

Browse all NYC schools · Compare schools · Map view

What the school community says

2026 NYC School Survey · Separate from academic ratings and neighborhood safety

K–12 survey · 2026

Family experience

The Jermaine L. Green STEM Institute of Queens

Feedback reflects respondents, not necessarily all families or staff. Consider participation alongside results.

Responses115

Response rate23%

Published topics12 / 12

A starting point for your school visit

Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Teacher is among the highest published topics (100/100). Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Advocate sits lower (50/100). These topics ask different questions: use the pattern to guide a conversation, not to infer a cause or an overall school grade.

Published topic scores (0–100), not an overall school rating. Colors describe score bands, not official quality grades.

Family Satisfaction with Child's Education
89 / 100

70–89 · Middle band

2026 reporting-record median: 94 · n=1,792. Same instrument/topic; not a citywide respondent rate.

Outreach to Parents
93 / 100

90–100 · Higher end

2026 reporting-record median: 95 · n=1,792. Same instrument/topic; not a citywide respondent rate.

Parent-Teacher Trust
96 / 100

90–100 · Higher end

2026 reporting-record median: 97 · n=1,792. Same instrument/topic; not a citywide respondent rate.

All 12 topics and source details
The Jermaine L. Green STEM Institute of Queens · 2026
TopicScoreScore band
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Advocate500–69 · Lower end
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Teacher10090–100 · Higher end
Conflict Resolution8870–89 · Middle band
Family Satisfaction with Child's Education8970–89 · Middle band
IEP Service Satisfaction8370–89 · Middle band
Inclusive Leadership9490–100 · Higher end
Outreach to Parents9390–100 · Higher end
Parent Involvement in School9790–100 · Higher end
Parent-Principal Trust9490–100 · Higher end
Parent-Teacher Trust9690–100 · Higher end
School Facilities and Services8770–89 · Middle band
Strong Relationships10090–100 · Higher end

Official data workbook ↗ · Source ID: 28Q354

Imported: 2026-09-15 · SHA-256: a53cfece9c20be0123c592679e8a5b3985b4e5ec10f03575d1911bf528b37885

How medians, score bands and missing values are handled

K–12 survey · 2026

Teaching & leadership

The Jermaine L. Green STEM Institute of Queens

Feedback reflects respondents, not necessarily all families or staff. Consider participation alongside results.

Responses18

Response rate32%

Published topics22 / 27

A starting point for your school visit

Guidance is among the highest published topics (100/100). Preventing Bullying sits lower (56/100). These topics ask different questions: use the pattern to guide a conversation, not to infer a cause or an overall school grade.

Published topic scores (0–100), not an overall school rating. Colors describe score bands, not official quality grades.

Instructional Leadership
89 / 100

70–89 · Middle band

2026 reporting-record median: 92 · n=1,762. Same instrument/topic; not a citywide respondent rate.

Peer Collaboration
87 / 100

70–89 · Middle band

2026 reporting-record median: 90 · n=1,762. Same instrument/topic; not a citywide respondent rate.

Academic Press
90 / 100

90–100 · Higher end

2026 reporting-record median: 89 · n=1,762. Same instrument/topic; not a citywide respondent rate.

All 27 topics and source details
The Jermaine L. Green STEM Institute of Queens · 2026
TopicScoreScore band
Academic Press9090–100 · Higher end
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary AdvocateNot reportedNot reported
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary TeacherNot reportedNot reported
Classroom Behavior560–69 · Lower end
Conflict Resolution8270–89 · Middle band
Cultural Awareness and Inclusive Classroom Instruction9590–100 · Higher end
Early Childhood InstructionNot reportedNot reported
Guidance10090–100 · Higher end
Inclusive Learning Environment9990–100 · Higher end
Innovation and Collective Responsibility8370–89 · Middle band
Instructional Leadership8970–89 · Middle band
Outreach to Parents9990–100 · Higher end
Peer Collaboration8770–89 · Middle band
Preventing Bullying560–69 · Lower end
Program Coherence9190–100 · Higher end
Quality of Professional Development8870–89 · Middle band
Quality of Student Discussion630–69 · Lower end
Safety9590–100 · Higher end
School Commitment7670–89 · Middle band
School Facilities and Services9490–100 · Higher end
Social-Emotional8170–89 · Middle band
Strong Core Instruction9390–100 · Higher end
Strong RelationshipsNot reportedNot reported
Teacher Influence7170–89 · Middle band
Teacher-Principal Trust8370–89 · Middle band
Teacher-Teacher Trust8770–89 · Middle band
Two-Way CommunicationNot reportedNot reported

Official data workbook ↗ · Source ID: 28Q354

Imported: 2026-09-15 · SHA-256: 205cdbbcff8c323f2b07345fea70a4740b58a10d1a0fc2f390b42eea35808a29

How medians, score bands and missing values are handled

Citywide findings · Sources and methodology