2026 Data analysis · The big picture

2026 NYC School Survey: results and what they mean for families

Explore NYC family, teacher, student and early-childhood survey results, with participation context and links to individual school feedback.

By NYC School Ratings Team · September 15, 2026 · 7 min read

The takeaway

Five perspectives. Not one school score.

The useful question is not “Which school wins the survey?” It is “What does each group experience—and whose feedback can we actually see?”

A school can look reassuring in a family survey while students describe a more complicated everyday experience. That is not automatically a contradiction. Families, teachers and students answer different questions, and early-childhood centers use their own instruments. We examined all five official 2026 summary files to separate the signals parents can use from the comparisons they should avoid.

First, separate participation from visibility

The official citywide report counts 871,154 respondents across families, students and teachers, excluding Birth-to-Five and support staff. Our five summary files contain 7,039 source records. Those are school- or center-level observations, not 7,039 people or distinct schools. The same provider can appear in more than one file. Even a record that exists may contain no published scores, so file size alone overstates how much feedback a parent can read.

Five datasets, very different visibility

Share of each official file's records with at least one published topic score. This measures data coverage—not satisfaction or response rate.

K–12 families97.1%

1,792 with scores · 54 with no published topic scores

K–12 teachers99.6%

1,763 with scores · 7 with no published topic scores

K–12 students94.6%

1,062 with scores · 61 with no published topic scores

Birth-to-5 families83.7%

1,040 with scores · 203 with no published topic scores

Birth-to-5 teachers14.3%

151 with scores · 906 with no published topic scores

All five imported datasets · 7,039 source records, not unique schools
DatasetFile recordsWith scoresUnder 10 responses
K–12 families1,8461,79275
K–12 teachers1,7701,76371
K–12 students1,1231,06288
Birth-to-5 families1,2431,040432
Birth-to-5 teachers1,057151992

Family feedback is positive—but that makes small differences less useful

In the K–12 family file, the median satisfaction-with-education score is 94 among 1,792 reporting records. Parent-teacher trust has a median of 97. When scores cluster near the ceiling, a one- or two-point gap is a poor reason to remove a school from a shortlist. Look instead for a pattern across communication, involvement and facilities, then check how many people responded. These are medians of published school records, not the share of all NYC parents who are satisfied.

Family trust is high; involvement and facilities sit lower

K–12 families · 2026 · Median published score across reporting records, not a percentage of NYC respondents.

Parent-Teacher Trust97 / 100

1,792 reporting records · middle half: 95–98

Inclusive Leadership97 / 100

1,792 reporting records · middle half: 95–98

Family Satisfaction with Child's Education94 / 100

1,792 reporting records · middle half: 92–96

Outreach to Parents95 / 100

1,792 reporting records · middle half: 92–96

Parent Involvement in School92 / 100

1,792 reporting records · middle half: 87–95

School Facilities and Services91 / 100

1,792 reporting records · middle half: 88–93

The exact numbers behind the chart · K–12 families
TopicMedianMiddle 50%*Reported / file records
Parent-Teacher Trust9795–981,792 / 1,846
Inclusive Leadership9795–981,792 / 1,846
Family Satisfaction with Child's Education9492–961,792 / 1,846
Outreach to Parents9592–961,792 / 1,846
Parent Involvement in School9287–951,792 / 1,846
School Facilities and Services9188–931,792 / 1,846

*25th–75th percentiles of published record scores; this is spread, not a confidence interval. Missing values are excluded separately for each topic. Source: official K–12 families summary sheet ↗. Equal weight per source record, including unmatched records.

Teacher feedback adds a different set of questions

Teacher results are more uneven across topics. Instructional leadership has a median published score of 92; teacher influence has a median of 68. Those measures are not interchangeable, and a 24-point separation is not a causal explanation. It is a reason to ask how staff participate in decisions, how collaboration works and how leadership responds to classroom needs. A single teacher composite would erase this distinction.

Student voice starts a new baseline

The student instrument changed substantially for 2026. Treat this release as a starting point, not proof of improvement or decline since last year. Among 1,062 reporting records, the median Safety topic score is 82, while Personal Attention and Support is 61. Feeling physically safe and feeling individually supported are different experiences. Both deserve a place in a school visit.

Birth-to-5 is included—and its gaps matter

Both Birth-to-5 files are included. The family file has 1,040 records with at least one published score out of 1,243. The teacher file has only 151 out of 1,057. That does not establish that the other centers are poor quality, or that their teachers are dissatisfied. It means the public summary does not provide a usable score for those records. A trustworthy profile needs to say that clearly rather than show zero or an alarming red grade.

Use the findings to build a better shortlist

Start with the programs, location and practical needs that matter to your family. Open a school profile and read the survey section one respondent group at a time. Choose one encouraging signal and one question to explore. A high score is an opening for a conversation—not a guarantee about your child’s experience. The survey layer complements academic data and neighborhood safety; it does not replace either.

Questions parents ask

Did you add both Birth-to-5 datasets?

Yes. Family and teacher results are stored separately and shown on exactly matched center and canonical school profiles. They are center-wide results, not specifically a 2-K cohort.

Can I compare the family and student numbers directly?

Not as equivalent measures. Questions, respondent groups and scoring context differ. Use each perspective to identify questions, not to subtract one group’s score from another.

Sources, scope and limitations

Analysis snapshot: September 15, 2026. School/center medians are our analysis of the official summary sheets; individual-question citywide percentages and borough participation rates are attributed separately to NYCPS. Topic coverage varies. Published scores reflect respondents and do not establish cause, admissions availability or academic quality.

Audit the five source files

Continue the analysis

Put the findings in context

See the data on a profile: P.S. 015 Roberto Clemente’s community feedback. Check the respondent group and participation; these are examples, not endorsements or representative citywide samples.

Independent analysis of public NYCPS data. Report a correction.