2026 Data analysis · Inside the staff room
2026 NYC teacher survey: teaching, collaboration and leadership
Understand teacher survey feedback on instruction, professional development and leadership, and how to read it alongside family and student results.
By NYC School Ratings Team · September 15, 2026 · 7 min read
The takeaway
Leadership scores are high. Teacher voice tells a more complicated story.
Read teaching conditions topic by topic. A strong leadership score should not hide questions about classroom behavior, discussion or staff influence.
Parents rarely see the daily work behind a classroom: how teachers collaborate, how decisions are made and what gets in the way of instruction. The 2026 teacher survey puts some of that experience into view. Of 1,770 summary records, 1,763 contain at least one published topic score. The main finding is not a single verdict on NYC schools—it is how much the pattern changes across topics.
The topic pattern is more revealing than a composite
Instructional leadership has a median score of 92 and peer collaboration 90. Teacher influence and classroom behavior each have medians of 68; preventing bullying is 67. Different questions underpin these measures, so these gaps are descriptive, not a controlled comparison. Still, they make the case for showing separate dimensions rather than averaging everything into an upbeat headline.
K–12 teachers · 2026 · Median published score across reporting records, not a percentage of NYC respondents.
1,762 reporting records · middle half: 85–96
1,762 reporting records · middle half: 82–95
1,762 reporting records · middle half: 79–93
1,762 reporting records · middle half: 58–79
1,762 reporting records · middle half: 59–78
1,761 reporting records · middle half: 50–81
| Topic | Median | Middle 50%* | Reported / file records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instructional Leadership | 92 | 85–96 | 1,762 / 1,770 |
| Peer Collaboration | 90 | 82–95 | 1,762 / 1,770 |
| Quality of Professional Development | 87 | 79–93 | 1,762 / 1,770 |
| Teacher Influence | 68 | 58–79 | 1,762 / 1,770 |
| Classroom Behavior | 68 | 59–78 | 1,762 / 1,770 |
| Preventing Bullying | 67 | 50–81 | 1,761 / 1,770 |
*25th–75th percentiles of published record scores; this is spread, not a confidence interval. Missing values are excluded separately for each topic. Source: official K–12 teachers summary sheet ↗. Equal weight per source record, including unmatched records.
Teacher influence varies across schools
The distribution below shows the range of published Teacher Influence scores, not a ranking of principals or an estimate of teacher retention. A low score can be a prompt to ask how staff contribute to decisions. It cannot tell us from this dataset alone whether a particular policy caused dissatisfaction, whether teachers will leave or whether academic outcomes will change.
K–12 teachers · 1,762 records with a published score. Bands are descriptive, not school-quality grades.
200 of 1,762 reporting records
743 of 1,762 reporting records
418 of 1,762 reporting records
276 of 1,762 reporting records
116 of 1,762 reporting records
9 of 1,762 reporting records
High outreach does not answer every communication question
Outreach to Parents has a median published teacher score of 98. That is encouraging as a description of responding staff, but it is not proof that every family receives information in the form they need. Use the family survey alongside it as a separate perspective. If the two accounts feel different, ask about translation, communication channels and how concerns are followed up. Do not calculate an average across the two instruments.
Coverage is part of the interpretation
Some topics apply to a narrower set of schools. Early Childhood Instruction appears in 423 records and Safety in 941, while several broader topics appear in about 1,762. A median based on a narrower group is not directly comparable to an all-school measure. The tables show the reporting count for each topic so that a tidy bar chart does not imply identical populations.
What to ask—and what not to infer
Ask how new teachers are supported, how staff plan together and how teachers influence school decisions. Ask for a concrete example of a change made after staff feedback. Do not use this survey as evidence of staffing stability, individual teacher quality or a causal effect on test scores. Those questions require different data. For your shortlist, the survey is most useful as a window into the working environment behind instruction.
Questions parents ask
Does a lower teacher score mean a school is unsafe?
No. Safety, preventing bullying, classroom behavior and teacher influence are separate topics. Their wording and reporting populations differ. Read the relevant topic and ask the school for context.
Are these year-over-year teacher trends?
No. This analysis describes the 2026 file. We do not show school-level changes until prior-year questions and scoring are checked for comparability.
Sources, scope and limitations
Analysis snapshot: September 15, 2026. School/center medians are our analysis of the official summary sheets; individual-question citywide percentages and borough participation rates are attributed separately to NYCPS. Topic coverage varies. Published scores reflect respondents and do not establish cause, admissions availability or academic quality.
- Official source for this page ↗
- NYC School Survey data downloads ↗
- 2026 scoring technical guide ↗
- Our methodology and matching rules
Audit the five source files
- K–12 families ↗
SHA-256: a53cfece9c20be0123c592679e8a5b3985b4e5ec10f03575d1911bf528b37885
- K–12 teachers ↗
SHA-256: 205cdbbcff8c323f2b07345fea70a4740b58a10d1a0fc2f390b42eea35808a29
- K–12 students ↗
SHA-256: 3185e1e7e4ba9c0de4fd7b7c9e91b7c11f15f6f8ecaac14cd199a582efdadf8e
- Birth-to-5 families ↗
SHA-256: bd24392caf95e084978cc6ee29ad07a496615a355e6be7c93e77619b34d680a4
- Birth-to-5 teachers ↗
SHA-256: b9e4ca80a82c535d20eac8963879d086001eb7daddea08c65d8fa1f4f4c64a64
Continue the analysis
2026 New York state test results: preliminary release and next update →
What the preliminary 2026 ELA, math and science release means, and why final school-level results are not yet used in NYC School Ratings.
2026 NYC School Survey: results and what they mean for families →
Explore NYC family, teacher, student and early-childhood survey results, with participation context and links to individual school feedback.
2026 NYC family survey: participation and school experience →
See how family survey participation changed across NYC boroughs and how to use school-level feedback on education, communication and trust.
2026 NYC student survey: a new baseline for school experience →
Explore the new 2026 student survey baseline, including school safety feedback, and understand why previous-year comparisons are not valid.
2026 NYC early-childhood survey: family and teacher feedback →
Understand Birth-to-5 survey feedback for NYC early-childhood centers, including what it can and cannot tell you about 2-K, 3-K and pre-K.
School survey methodology, sources and limitations →
How NYC School Ratings links official survey results to schools, preserves missing values and separates respondent groups, years and rating calculations.
Put the findings in context
- NYC Schools 2025: The COVID Recovery Story
Read teacher working conditions alongside academic recovery, without assuming one caused the other.
See the data on a profile: P.S. 015 Roberto Clemente’s community feedback. Check the respondent group and participation; these are examples, not endorsements or representative citywide samples.
Independent analysis of public NYCPS data. Report a correction.