2026 Data analysis · Inside the staff room

2026 NYC teacher survey: teaching, collaboration and leadership

Understand teacher survey feedback on instruction, professional development and leadership, and how to read it alongside family and student results.

By NYC School Ratings Team · September 15, 2026 · 7 min read

The takeaway

Leadership scores are high. Teacher voice tells a more complicated story.

Read teaching conditions topic by topic. A strong leadership score should not hide questions about classroom behavior, discussion or staff influence.

Parents rarely see the daily work behind a classroom: how teachers collaborate, how decisions are made and what gets in the way of instruction. The 2026 teacher survey puts some of that experience into view. Of 1,770 summary records, 1,763 contain at least one published topic score. The main finding is not a single verdict on NYC schools—it is how much the pattern changes across topics.

The topic pattern is more revealing than a composite

Instructional leadership has a median score of 92 and peer collaboration 90. Teacher influence and classroom behavior each have medians of 68; preventing bullying is 67. Different questions underpin these measures, so these gaps are descriptive, not a controlled comparison. Still, they make the case for showing separate dimensions rather than averaging everything into an upbeat headline.

Teacher experience varies substantially by topic

K–12 teachers · 2026 · Median published score across reporting records, not a percentage of NYC respondents.

Instructional Leadership92 / 100

1,762 reporting records · middle half: 85–96

Peer Collaboration90 / 100

1,762 reporting records · middle half: 82–95

Quality of Professional Development87 / 100

1,762 reporting records · middle half: 79–93

Teacher Influence68 / 100

1,762 reporting records · middle half: 58–79

Classroom Behavior68 / 100

1,762 reporting records · middle half: 59–78

Preventing Bullying67 / 100

1,761 reporting records · middle half: 50–81

The exact numbers behind the chart · K–12 teachers
TopicMedianMiddle 50%*Reported / file records
Instructional Leadership9285–961,762 / 1,770
Peer Collaboration9082–951,762 / 1,770
Quality of Professional Development8779–931,762 / 1,770
Teacher Influence6858–791,762 / 1,770
Classroom Behavior6859–781,762 / 1,770
Preventing Bullying6750–811,761 / 1,770

*25th–75th percentiles of published record scores; this is spread, not a confidence interval. Missing values are excluded separately for each topic. Source: official K–12 teachers summary sheet ↗. Equal weight per source record, including unmatched records.

Teacher influence varies across schools

The distribution below shows the range of published Teacher Influence scores, not a ranking of principals or an estimate of teacher retention. A low score can be a prompt to ask how staff contribute to decisions. It cannot tell us from this dataset alone whether a particular policy caused dissatisfaction, whether teachers will leave or whether academic outcomes will change.

Where the scores cluster: Teacher Influence

K–12 teachers · 1,762 records with a published score. Bands are descriptive, not school-quality grades.

Score 0–4911.4%

200 of 1,762 reporting records

Score 50–6942.2%

743 of 1,762 reporting records

Score 70–7923.7%

418 of 1,762 reporting records

Score 80–8915.7%

276 of 1,762 reporting records

Score 90–996.6%

116 of 1,762 reporting records

Score 1000.5%

9 of 1,762 reporting records

High outreach does not answer every communication question

Outreach to Parents has a median published teacher score of 98. That is encouraging as a description of responding staff, but it is not proof that every family receives information in the form they need. Use the family survey alongside it as a separate perspective. If the two accounts feel different, ask about translation, communication channels and how concerns are followed up. Do not calculate an average across the two instruments.

Coverage is part of the interpretation

Some topics apply to a narrower set of schools. Early Childhood Instruction appears in 423 records and Safety in 941, while several broader topics appear in about 1,762. A median based on a narrower group is not directly comparable to an all-school measure. The tables show the reporting count for each topic so that a tidy bar chart does not imply identical populations.

What to ask—and what not to infer

Ask how new teachers are supported, how staff plan together and how teachers influence school decisions. Ask for a concrete example of a change made after staff feedback. Do not use this survey as evidence of staffing stability, individual teacher quality or a causal effect on test scores. Those questions require different data. For your shortlist, the survey is most useful as a window into the working environment behind instruction.

Questions parents ask

Does a lower teacher score mean a school is unsafe?

No. Safety, preventing bullying, classroom behavior and teacher influence are separate topics. Their wording and reporting populations differ. Read the relevant topic and ask the school for context.

Are these year-over-year teacher trends?

No. This analysis describes the 2026 file. We do not show school-level changes until prior-year questions and scoring are checked for comparability.

Sources, scope and limitations

Analysis snapshot: September 15, 2026. School/center medians are our analysis of the official summary sheets; individual-question citywide percentages and borough participation rates are attributed separately to NYCPS. Topic coverage varies. Published scores reflect respondents and do not establish cause, admissions availability or academic quality.

Audit the five source files

Continue the analysis

Put the findings in context

See the data on a profile: P.S. 015 Roberto Clemente’s community feedback. Check the respondent group and participation; these are examples, not endorsements or representative citywide samples.

Independent analysis of public NYCPS data. Report a correction.