2026 Data analysis · Birth-to-5 · Two separate datasets

2026 NYC early-childhood survey: family and teacher feedback

Understand Birth-to-5 survey feedback for NYC early-childhood centers, including what it can and cannot tell you about 2-K, 3-K and pre-K.

By NYC School Ratings Team · September 15, 2026 · 7 min read

The takeaway

Families sound positive. Teacher feedback is much harder to see.

Both Birth-to-5 datasets are here. Strong family scores need participation context; missing teacher scores must never become a negative judgment about a center.

For families looking at 2-K, 3-K or pre-K, test-score rankings are the wrong tool. Relationships, communication and the everyday learning environment are more relevant questions. The Birth-to-5 family and teacher surveys provide two distinct views. We analyzed 1,243 family-file records and 1,057 teacher-file records. The most important finding is as much about what is not published as what is.

Family feedback: positive scores with a ceiling effect

Among the 1,037 records reporting Family Satisfaction with Child’s Education, the median score is 100. Parent-Teacher Trust also has a median of 100 among 1,039 reporting records; Outreach to Parents is 98. That is positive feedback from respondents, but it leaves little room for a simple ranking to discriminate among centers. A perfect published score is not a guarantee about every family’s experience.

Birth-to-5 families: positive feedback, little room at the top

Birth-to-5 families · 2026 · Median published score across reporting records, not a percentage of NYC respondents.

Family Satisfaction with Child's Education100 / 100

1,037 reporting records · middle half: 98–100

Parent-Teacher Trust100 / 100

1,039 reporting records · middle half: 97–100

Outreach to Parents98 / 100

1,039 reporting records · middle half: 95–100

Parent Involvement in School96 / 100

1,039 reporting records · middle half: 93–99

School Facilities and Services96 / 100

1,037 reporting records · middle half: 91–100

Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Advocate94 / 100

1,009 reporting records · middle half: 82–100

The exact numbers behind the chart · Birth-to-5 families
TopicMedianMiddle 50%*Reported / file records
Family Satisfaction with Child's Education10098–1001,037 / 1,243
Parent-Teacher Trust10097–1001,039 / 1,243
Outreach to Parents9895–1001,039 / 1,243
Parent Involvement in School9693–991,039 / 1,243
School Facilities and Services9691–1001,037 / 1,243
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Advocate9482–1001,009 / 1,243

*25th–75th percentiles of published record scores; this is spread, not a confidence interval. Missing values are excluded separately for each topic. Source: official Birth-to-5 families summary sheet ↗. Equal weight per source record, including unmatched records.

The family file needs a participation lens

There are 432 family-file records with fewer than ten responses. The Birth-to-5 summary does not supply response rates, so we cannot tell parents what share of eligible families those counts represent. We show the count, keep the rate as “Not reported” and flag small counts. Our under-ten caution is a product convention, not a claim about the official suppression threshold. Missing values can have more than one explanation.

Where the scores cluster: Family Satisfaction with Child's Education

Birth-to-5 families · 1,037 records with a published score. Bands are descriptive, not school-quality grades.

Score 0–490.1%

1 of 1,037 reporting records

Score 50–690.3%

3 of 1,037 reporting records

Score 70–790.5%

5 of 1,037 reporting records

Score 80–893%

31 of 1,037 reporting records

Score 90–9929.3%

304 of 1,037 reporting records

Score 10066.8%

693 of 1,037 reporting records

Teacher feedback: included does not mean fully visible

The teacher dataset is imported in full, but only 151 of its 1,057 records contain any published topic score. The other 906 contain none. There are 992 records with fewer than ten teacher responses. These counts do not prove why a particular score is missing. Small staff teams and reporting rules are important context, but the file itself should not be used to diagnose the reason for every blank.

Published teacher feedback covers a much smaller subset

Percentage of each Birth-to-5 file's records with any published topic score—not a response rate.

Birth-to-5 families83.7%

1,040 of 1,243 records have scores; 203 have none

Birth-to-5 teachers14.3%

151 of 1,057 records have scores; 906 have none

What the published teacher subset can tell us

Within the much smaller reporting subset, Early Childhood Instruction and Peer Collaboration have median scores of 100. Classroom Behavior is 76 and Teacher Influence is 82.5. These describe reporting records only—not all NYC early-childhood teachers or centers. Guidance, Safety and Strong Core Instruction have no published topic scores anywhere in this teacher summary, so we do not draw a bar or infer a result for those topics.

Birth-to-5 teachers: what the reporting subset says

Birth-to-5 teachers · 2026 · Median published score across reporting records, not a percentage of NYC respondents.

Early Childhood Instruction100 / 100

144 reporting records · middle half: 96.8–100

Peer Collaboration100 / 100

146 reporting records · middle half: 94–100

Instructional Leadership100 / 100

142 reporting records · middle half: 95.3–100

Teacher Influence82.5 / 100

146 reporting records · middle half: 72–90.8

Classroom Behavior76 / 100

143 reporting records · middle half: 58.5–88.5

Quality of Student Discussion69 / 100

144 reporting records · middle half: 55.8–86.3

The exact numbers behind the chart · Birth-to-5 teachers
TopicMedianMiddle 50%*Reported / file records
Early Childhood Instruction10096.8–100144 / 1,057
Peer Collaboration10094–100146 / 1,057
Instructional Leadership10095.3–100142 / 1,057
Teacher Influence82.572–90.8146 / 1,057
Classroom Behavior7658.5–88.5143 / 1,057
Quality of Student Discussion6955.8–86.3144 / 1,057

*25th–75th percentiles of published record scores; this is spread, not a confidence interval. Missing values are excluded separately for each topic. Source: official Birth-to-5 teachers summary sheet ↗. Equal weight per source record, including unmatched records.

A center-wide result is not a 2-K result

A provider may offer 2-K, 3-K and pre-K under one canonical school record. Birth-to-5 feedback belongs to the center, not automatically to one age group or classroom. We match by official center identifiers and existing school relationships. A shared address or a similar name is not enough. The survey also does not establish current seats, admissions priority or automatic progression into kindergarten.

Use the data when you visit

Ask how staff describe a child’s day, how caregivers communicate concerns and how teachers adapt activities for different developmental stages. If the teacher panel has no published scores, ask about staff support and continuity directly rather than assuming a problem. For a high family score, ask what families value most. The most useful result is a more focused conversation about the center your child would actually attend.

Questions parents ask

Are the family and teacher datasets both on profiles?

Yes, wherever their official identifiers match. They have separate cards, sources and response counts. A teacher record with no published scores is shown as a coverage limitation, not omitted or scored zero.

Can I use this to rank 2-K providers?

Not as an academic or 2-K-specific ranking. The feedback is center-wide, coverage varies and many family scores cluster at the ceiling. Use it alongside program fit and a visit.

Sources, scope and limitations

Analysis snapshot: September 15, 2026. School/center medians are our analysis of the official summary sheets; individual-question citywide percentages and borough participation rates are attributed separately to NYCPS. Topic coverage varies. Published scores reflect respondents and do not establish cause, admissions availability or academic quality.

Audit the five source files

Continue the analysis

Put the findings in context

See the data on a profile: Hebrew Educational Society of Brooklyn’s Birth-to-5 feedback. Check the respondent group and participation; these are examples, not endorsements or representative citywide samples.

Independent analysis of public NYCPS data. Report a correction.